head to head · open source

anime vs Gum

anime has 72,905 GitHub stars, 4,928 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. Gum has 620 stars, 81 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. anime leads on adoption by 11,659% (72,905 vs 620 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; Gum is written in C# under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Gum 13%. Gum was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K Gum ★ 620 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime Gum
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 620
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick Gum if

  • You want the Gum feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Gum fits your workflow better

full Gum profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About Gum

Gum is an MIT licensed C UI layout tool built on object oriented principles, distributed as NuGet runtimes for MonoGame, KNI, raylib, SkiaSharp, MAUI and FNA, and intended for developers who need one flexible, inheritance driven layout system across game engines and .NET platforms.

read the full Gum overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs Figma-Context-MCP anime vs Tkinter-Designer anime vs pencil anime vs dicebear

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or Gum more popular?

anime has 72,905 GitHub stars and Gum has 620. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and Gum free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and Gum under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and Gum?

anime is written in JavaScript and Gum in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or Gum?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,905 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Gum if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.