head to head · open source

anime vs functional-ui-kit

anime has 73,360 GitHub stars, 4,957 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. functional-ui-kit has 620 stars, 26 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. anime leads on adoption by 11,732% (73,360 vs 620 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; functional-ui-kit is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, functional-ui-kit 4%. functional-ui-kit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K functional-ui-kit ★ 620 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime functional-ui-kit
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 620
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 26
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick functional-ui-kit if

  • You want the functional-ui-kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and functional-ui-kit fits your workflow better

full functional-ui-kit profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About functional-ui-kit

functional ui kit is a TypeScript React component library with a matching Figma library for design and development teams that want designers and engineers working from the same variables and component names.

read the full functional-ui-kit overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or functional-ui-kit more popular?

anime has 73,360 GitHub stars and functional-ui-kit has 620. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and functional-ui-kit free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and functional-ui-kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and functional-ui-kit?

anime is written in JavaScript and functional-ui-kit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or functional-ui-kit?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,360 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose functional-ui-kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.