head to head · open source

anime vs flowbite

anime has 72,905 GitHub stars, 4,928 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. flowbite has 9,357 stars, 862 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 679% (72,905 vs 9,357 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; flowbite is written in HTML under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, flowbite 9%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (css, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K flowbite ★ 9.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime flowbite
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 9.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript HTML
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-06-27
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 862
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick flowbite if

  • You want the flowbite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and flowbite fits your workflow better

full flowbite profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About flowbite

Flowbite is an open source UI component library and front end development framework built on top of Tailwind CSS, intended for developers and design teams who want ready made components rather than writing every utility class by hand.

read the full flowbite overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs Figma-Context-MCP anime vs Tkinter-Designer anime vs pencil anime vs dicebear

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or flowbite more popular?

anime has 72,905 GitHub stars and flowbite has 9,357. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and flowbite free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and flowbite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and flowbite?

anime is written in JavaScript and flowbite in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or flowbite?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,905 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowbite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.