head to head · open source

anime vs FigmaToCode

anime has 72,944 GitHub stars, 4,931 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. FigmaToCode has 5,197 stars, 503 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 1,304% (72,944 vs 5,197 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; FigmaToCode is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, FigmaToCode 10%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K FigmaToCode ★ 5.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime FigmaToCode
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 5.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-08-05
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 503
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick FigmaToCode if

  • You want the FigmaToCode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and FigmaToCode fits your workflow better

full FigmaToCode profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About FigmaToCode

Figma to Code is a free, open source Figma plugin that converts a selected frame, component, or group of layers into editable HTML, React, Svelte, Tailwind, Flutter, or SwiftUI code without requiring an account, generation credits, or uploading designs to another service, and it is aimed at designers and developers working in the handoff moment between a visual design and a real implementation.

read the full FigmaToCode overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs Figma-Context-MCP anime vs Tkinter-Designer

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or FigmaToCode more popular?

anime has 72,944 GitHub stars and FigmaToCode has 5,197. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and FigmaToCode free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and FigmaToCode under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and FigmaToCode?

anime is written in JavaScript and FigmaToCode in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or FigmaToCode?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,944 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FigmaToCode if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.