head to head · open source

anime vs Easy3D

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars, 4,929 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. Easy3D has 1,656 stars, 277 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. anime leads on adoption by 4,302% (72,899 vs 1,656 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; Easy3D is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Easy3D 17%. Easy3D was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K Easy3D ★ 1.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime Easy3D
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 1.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 277
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick Easy3D if

  • You want the Easy3D feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Easy3D fits your workflow better

full Easy3D profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About Easy3D

Easy3D is a lightweight C++ library with Python bindings for processing and rendering 3D data, built for researchers, educators, and developers who need point clouds, polygonal meshes, polyhedral volumes, and graphs handled efficiently without writing low level OpenGL code.

read the full Easy3D overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs Figma-Context-MCP anime vs Tkinter-Designer anime vs pencil anime vs dicebear anime vs OpenPencil anime vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or Easy3D more popular?

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars and Easy3D has 1,656. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and Easy3D free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and Easy3D under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and Easy3D?

anime is written in JavaScript and Easy3D in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or Easy3D?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,899 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Easy3D if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.