head to head · open source

anime vs design-tokens

anime has 73,180 GitHub stars, 4,945 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. design-tokens has 1,126 stars, 149 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 6,399% (73,180 vs 1,126 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; design-tokens is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, design-tokens 13%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K design-tokens ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime design-tokens
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-02-16
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 149
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick design-tokens if

  • You want the design-tokens feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and design-tokens fits your workflow better

full design-tokens profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About design-tokens

Design Tokens is a TypeScript authored Figma plugin, released under the MIT licence, that exports the design tokens defined in a Figma document as JSON in an Amazon Style Dictionary compatible format, for design system teams that need token values to flow from Figma into web, iOS, and Android builds.

read the full design-tokens overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or design-tokens more popular?

anime has 73,180 GitHub stars and design-tokens has 1,126. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and design-tokens free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and design-tokens under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and design-tokens?

anime is written in JavaScript and design-tokens in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or design-tokens?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,180 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose design-tokens if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.