head to head · open source

anime vs charm

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars, 4,929 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. charm has 649 stars, 169 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. anime leads on adoption by 11,133% (72,899 vs 649 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; charm is written in Python under LGPL-3.0. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, charm 26%. charm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K charm ★ 649 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime charm
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 649
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 169
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick charm if

  • You want the charm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and charm fits your workflow better

full charm profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About charm

Charm (Charm Crypto) is a Python based framework for rapidly prototyping advanced cryptosystems — attribute based encryption, identity based encryption, pairing based schemes, threshold ECDSA, and zero knowledge proofs — built for researchers and engineers who need working schemes without hand writing the underlying mathematics.

read the full charm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs Figma-Context-MCP anime vs Tkinter-Designer anime vs pencil anime vs dicebear anime vs OpenPencil anime vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or charm more popular?

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars and charm has 649. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and charm free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and charm under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and charm?

anime is written in JavaScript and charm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or charm?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,899 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose charm if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.