head to head · open source

anime vs canvas-confetti

anime has 73,075 GitHub stars, 4,940 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. canvas-confetti has 12,762 stars, 464 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 473% (73,075 vs 12,762 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; canvas-confetti is written in JavaScript under ISC. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, canvas-confetti 4%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (animation, canvas), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K canvas-confetti ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime canvas-confetti
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 13K
License MIT ISC
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2025-10-25
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 464
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick canvas-confetti if

  • You want the canvas-confetti feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and canvas-confetti fits your workflow better

full canvas-confetti profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About canvas-confetti

canvas confetti is an ISC licensed JavaScript library, published on npm and loadable from a CDN, that draws performant confetti particle animations onto a browser canvas through a single confetti() call — built for front end developers who want a celebration effect in a web page without writing their own particle engine.

read the full canvas-confetti overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or canvas-confetti more popular?

anime has 73,075 GitHub stars and canvas-confetti has 12,762. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and canvas-confetti free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and canvas-confetti under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and canvas-confetti?

anime is written in JavaScript and canvas-confetti in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or canvas-confetti?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose canvas-confetti if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.