head to head · open source
alive-progress vs ClearFlask
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars, 236 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ClearFlask has 451 stars, 45 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 1,298% (6,307 vs 451 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; ClearFlask is written in Java under Apache-2.0. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, ClearFlask 10%. ClearFlask was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | ClearFlask | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 451 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 236 | ⑂ 45 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ClearFlask if
- You want the ClearFlask feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ClearFlask fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress is a Python progress bar library for long running command line processing, aimed at developers who need live throughput, an accurate ETA, and rich terminal animation instead of a static bar.
read the full alive-progress overview →
About ClearFlask
ClearFlask is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed feedback management and ideation tool for product teams that want to collect user requests, run voting, and publish a roadmap on infrastructure they control.
read the full ClearFlask overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or ClearFlask more popular?
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars and ClearFlask has 451. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and ClearFlask free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and ClearFlask under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and ClearFlask?
alive-progress is written in Python and ClearFlask in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or ClearFlask?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,307 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ClearFlask if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.