head to head · open source
alive-progress vs ClearFlask
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. ClearFlask has 450 stars, 45 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 1,305% (6,323 vs 450 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; ClearFlask is written in Java under Apache-2.0. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, ClearFlask 10%. ClearFlask was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | ClearFlask | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 450 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 45 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ClearFlask if
- You want the ClearFlask feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ClearFlask fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About ClearFlask
Open source Feedback Management Tool. Alternative to Canny and UserVoice . Contents Managed hosting Self hosting One click deploy Quick start Kubernetes deployment Deploy dependencies Via Docker Via Kubernetes Via AWS Deploy ClearFlask Setup Run Maintenance Migration between Elasticsearch/MySQL Contributing Code quality Building Architecture Release Security Policy Managed Hosting Support our open source development by choosing cloud hosting with scalable pricing, check us out on our website. Self Hosting One click deploy Deploy a self contained instance (API server, SSR frontend, MariaDB) in a few clicks — no…
read the full ClearFlask overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or ClearFlask more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and ClearFlask has 450. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and ClearFlask free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and ClearFlask under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and ClearFlask?
alive-progress is written in Python and ClearFlask in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or ClearFlask?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ClearFlask if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.