head to head · open source

Coder vs zeroshot

Coder has 16,832 GitHub stars, 1,607 forks, 996 open issues and last shipped today. zeroshot has 1,919 stars, 180 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Coder leads on adoption by 777% (16,832 vs 1,919 stars). Coder is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; zeroshot is written in Rust under MIT. Coder has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, zeroshot 9%. Coder was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Coder ★ 17K zeroshot ★ 1.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Coder zeroshot
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 1.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 180
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Coder if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Coder profile →

pick zeroshot if

  • You want the zeroshot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and zeroshot fits your workflow better

full zeroshot profile →

About Coder

Coder is a self hosted platform for cloud development environments and AI coding agents. It is written in Go, released under AGPL 3.0, and listed under Developer Tools / Version Control & Collaboration. Teams define workspaces with Terraform, connect through a secure Wireguard tunnel, and run environments on EC2 VMs, Kubernetes Pods, or Docker Containers.

read the full Coder overview →

About zeroshot

Zeroshot is an open source, MIT licensed Rust CLI that orchestrates coding agents as an explicit review graph for developers who want AI written changes verified by agents other than the one that wrote them.

read the full zeroshot overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 272K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Coder vs Gitea Coder vs Gogs Coder vs open-code-review Coder vs code-review-graph Coder vs Reflex Coder vs GitLab Coder vs GitButler Coder vs gitpod Coder vs pr-agent Coder vs Encore Coder vs reviewdog Coder vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Coder or zeroshot more popular?

Coder has 16,832 GitHub stars and zeroshot has 1,919. Coder has the larger community by that measure.

Are Coder and zeroshot free?

Both are open source. Coder is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and zeroshot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Coder and zeroshot?

Coder is written in Go and zeroshot in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Coder or zeroshot?

Choose Coder if you want the larger community (16,832 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose zeroshot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.