head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs WR.DO

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,280 stars, 365 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 3,702% (86,684 vs 2,280 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K WR.DO ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor WR.DO
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 2.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 365
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick WR.DO if

  • You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better

full WR.DO profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About WR.DO

WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.

read the full WR.DO overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs wr-do worldmonitor vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do mall vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn immich vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs openvpn mall vs openvpn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or WR.DO more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,280. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and WR.DO free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and WR.DO?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or WR.DO?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.