head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs WR.DO
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,280 stars, 365 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 3,702% (86,684 vs 2,280 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 365 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About WR.DO
WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or WR.DO more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,280. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and WR.DO?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or WR.DO?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.