head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs pyroscope
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pyroscope has 11,661 stars, 802 forks, 400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 643% (86,684 vs 11,661 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; pyroscope is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, pyroscope 7%. pyroscope was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | pyroscope | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 12K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 802 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pyroscope if
- You want the pyroscope feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and pyroscope fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About pyroscope
Grafana Pyroscope is a continuous profiling platform for developers, SREs, and platform teams who need to find CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks in running applications and trace them down to a single line of code.
read the full pyroscope overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or pyroscope more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and pyroscope has 11,661. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and pyroscope free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pyroscope under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and pyroscope?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and pyroscope in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or pyroscope?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pyroscope if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.