head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs nezha
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nezha has 10,390 stars, 1,616 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 766% (90,021 vs 10,390 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; nezha is written in Go under WTFPL. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, nezha 16%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | nezha | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 10K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | WTFPL |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nezha if
- You want the nezha feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the WTFPL license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and nezha fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About nezha
LOGO designed by 熊大 . :trollface: Nezha Monitoring: Self hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. Supports monitoring system status, HTTP (SSL certificate change, upcoming expiration, expired), TCP, Ping and supports push alerts , run scheduled tasks and web terminal . \ Telegram Channel: 哪吒监控（中文通知频道） \ Telegram Group: Nezha Monitoring Global (English Only), 哪吒监控（中文群组） \ Use Cases 我们的用户 (Google) Sponsors / 赞助商 VMRack 洛杉矶 VPS｜CN2 GIA + AS9929 + CMIN2 三网精品线路，AMD + NVMe 高性能！ 👉 vmrack 🚀 99CDN｜自建 CDN，不止是加速！ 边缘缓存 + 智能调度 + 自动故障切换 + 商业化运营 🌐 99cdn AxisNow｜自建私有部署 CDN｜订阅式高防 CDN 自主可控、灵活组合的 CDN…
read the full nezha overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or nezha more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and nezha has 10,390. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and nezha free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nezha under WTFPL. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and nezha?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and nezha in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or nezha?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nezha if its feature set, stack or WTFPL licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.