head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs Maple

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Maple has 1,783 stars, 119 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 4,762% (86,684 vs 1,783 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Maple is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Maple 7%. Maple was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K Maple ★ 1.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor Maple
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 1.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick Maple if

  • You want the Maple feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Maple fits your workflow better

full Maple profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About Maple

Maple is an open source observability platform for traces, logs, and metrics, and it lives in the OpenTelemetry ecosystem within the Infrastructure & Operations / Monitoring & Observability category. The project is built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse, and the repository is organized as a TypeScript monorepo with a single page application frontend and an Effect based backend API.

read the full Maple overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or Maple more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and Maple has 1,783. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and Maple free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Maple has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and Maple?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and Maple in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or Maple?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Maple if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.