head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs magic-trace
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magic-trace has 6,345 stars, 222 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,319% (90,021 vs 6,345 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; magic-trace is written in OCaml under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, magic-trace 3%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | magic-trace | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | OCaml |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 222 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic-trace if
- You want the magic-trace feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches OCaml
- You evaluated both and magic-trace fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About magic-trace
magic trace Overview magic trace collects and displays high resolution traces of what a process is doing. People have used it to: figure out why an application running in production handles some requests slowly while simultaneously handling a sea of uninteresting requests, look at what their code is actually doing instead of what they think it's doing, get a history of what their application was doing before it crashed, instead of a mere stacktrace at that final instant, ...and much more! magic trace: has 2% 10% overhead, doesn't require application changes to use, traces every function call with 40ns…
read the full magic-trace overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or magic-trace more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and magic-trace has 6,345. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and magic-trace free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and magic-trace under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and magic-trace?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and magic-trace in OCaml. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or magic-trace?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose magic-trace if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.