head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs ktop

worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars, 13,161 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ktop has 1,109 stars, 25 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 7,723% (86,752 vs 1,109 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; ktop is written in Go under Apache-2.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, ktop 2%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K ktop ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor ktop
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 1.1K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 25
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick ktop if

  • You want the ktop feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ktop fits your workflow better

full ktop profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About ktop

ktop is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based terminal tool that shows live metrics for nodes, pods, and containers in a Kubernetes cluster, built for operators and developers who want top style cluster visibility without installing anything inside the cluster.

read the full ktop overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or ktop more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars and ktop has 1,109. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and ktop free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ktop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and ktop?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and ktop in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or ktop?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,752 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ktop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.