head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs HyperDX
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HyperDX has 9,897 stars, 469 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 776% (86,684 vs 9,897 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; HyperDX is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, HyperDX 5%. HyperDX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dashboard, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | HyperDX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 9.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 469 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HyperDX if
- You want the HyperDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and HyperDX fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About HyperDX
HyperDX is an open source observability platform that unifies session replays, logs, metrics, traces, and errors. It is built on ClickHouse and OpenTelemetry, and it is positioned as a core component of ClickStack. The project lives in the open source infrastructure and operations ecosystem, especially around log management, application monitoring, frontend monitoring, Kubernetes, and APM.
read the full HyperDX overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or HyperDX more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and HyperDX has 9,897. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and HyperDX free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and HyperDX under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and HyperDX?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and HyperDX in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or HyperDX?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose HyperDX if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.