head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs django-silk
worldmonitor has 88,861 GitHub stars, 13,637 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped today. django-silk has 4,996 stars, 378 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,679% (88,861 vs 4,996 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; django-silk is written in Python under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, django-silk 8%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | django-silk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 89K | ★ 5.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 378 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 89K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-silk if
- You want the django-silk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-silk fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About django-silk
Silk Silk is a live profiling and inspection tool for the Django framework. Silk intercepts and stores HTTP requests and database queries before presenting them in a user interface for further inspection: Contents Requirements Installation Features Configuration Authentication/Authorisation Request/Response bodies Meta Profiling Recording a fraction of requests Ignoring specific paths Limiting request/response data Clearing logged data Contributing Development Environment Requirements Silk has been tested with: Django: 5.2, 6.0, 6.1 Python: 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 Installation Via pip into a…
read the full django-silk overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or django-silk more popular?
worldmonitor has 88,861 GitHub stars and django-silk has 4,996. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and django-silk free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and django-silk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and django-silk?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and django-silk in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or django-silk?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (88,861 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose django-silk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.