head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs codeburn
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codeburn has 11,664 stars, 903 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 672% (90,021 vs 11,664 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 12K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 903 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About codeburn
See where your AI spend goes. If CodeBurn shows you something your bill never did, star the repo so other developers find it, and consider sponsoring to keep 41 integrations honest. npx codeburn To keep it: npm install g codeburn or brew install codeburn . Needs Node.js 22.13+. Desktop app 0.9.25. The macOS builds are signed with a Developer ID and notarized by Apple. The problem Your bill gives you a month total. It does not break that down by project, by model or by task, and it does not show which part of it was wasted. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the rest each write a session file every time you use them…
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or codeburn more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,664. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and codeburn free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and codeburn?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or codeburn?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.