head to head · open source

traefik vs zoraxy

traefik has 64,957 GitHub stars, 6,205 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zoraxy has 5,490 stars, 323 forks, 159 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 1,083% (64,957 vs 5,490 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; zoraxy is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, zoraxy 6%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K zoraxy ★ 5.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik zoraxy
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 5.5K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 323
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick zoraxy if

  • You want the zoraxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and zoraxy fits your workflow better

full zoraxy profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About zoraxy

Zoraxy is a general purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool, now written in Go, aimed at homelab owners, makers, and small operations teams who need to route traffic to several self hosted services without hand maintaining proxy configuration files.

read the full zoraxy overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or zoraxy more popular?

traefik has 64,957 GitHub stars and zoraxy has 5,490. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and zoraxy free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and zoraxy under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and zoraxy?

traefik is written in Go and zoraxy in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or zoraxy?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (64,957 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zoraxy if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.