head to head · open source

traefik vs wiredoor

traefik has 65,105 GitHub stars, 6,228 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wiredoor has 1,623 stars, 78 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 3,911% (65,105 vs 1,623 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; wiredoor is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, wiredoor 5%. wiredoor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K wiredoor ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik wiredoor
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 1.6K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-07 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 78
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick wiredoor if

  • You want the wiredoor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and wiredoor fits your workflow better

full wiredoor profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About wiredoor

wiredoor is a self hosted ingress as a service platform for developers and infrastructure operators who need to expose HTTP, TCP, and UDP services running behind NAT or firewalls in private networks to the internet.

read the full wiredoor overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or wiredoor more popular?

traefik has 65,105 GitHub stars and wiredoor has 1,623. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and wiredoor free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and wiredoor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and wiredoor?

traefik is written in Go and wiredoor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or wiredoor?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,105 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wiredoor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.