head to head · open source

traefik vs SoftEtherVPN

traefik has 64,898 GitHub stars, 6,201 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SoftEtherVPN has 13,562 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. traefik leads on adoption by 379% (64,898 vs 13,562 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 21%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns traefik vs sliver traefik vs smartdns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

traefik has 64,898 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,562. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and SoftEtherVPN?

traefik is written in Go and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (64,898 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.