head to head · open source

traefik vs sliver

traefik has 64,895 GitHub stars, 6,201 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sliver has 11,852 stars, 1,587 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 448% (64,895 vs 11,852 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; sliver is written in Go under GPL-3.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sliver 13%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K sliver ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik sliver
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 12K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick sliver if

  • You want the sliver feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sliver fits your workflow better

full sliver profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About sliver

Sliver is an open source, cross platform adversary emulation and red team framework written in Go, used by security teams of all sizes to perform authorized security testing with implants that support command and control over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), and DNS.

read the full sliver overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns traefik vs smartdns traefik vs OpenSurge-for-Mac traefik vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or sliver more popular?

traefik has 64,895 GitHub stars and sliver has 11,852. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and sliver free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and sliver under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and sliver?

traefik is written in Go and sliver in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or sliver?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (64,895 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sliver if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.