head to head · open source

traefik vs sdns

traefik has 65,020 GitHub stars, 6,215 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sdns has 1,086 stars, 72 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 5,887% (65,020 vs 1,086 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; sdns is written in Go under MIT. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sdns 7%. sdns was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K sdns ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik sdns
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 72
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick sdns if

  • You want the sdns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sdns fits your workflow better

full sdns profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About sdns

sdns is a high performance recursive DNS resolver written in Go that resolves from the root, validates answers against DNSSEC trust anchors and serves DNS over UDP, TCP, TLS, HTTPS and QUIC, intended for operators and privacy focused self hosters who want to run their own resolving name server instead of relying on a third party resolver.

read the full sdns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or sdns more popular?

traefik has 65,020 GitHub stars and sdns has 1,086. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and sdns free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and sdns under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and sdns?

traefik is written in Go and sdns in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or sdns?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,020 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sdns if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.