head to head · open source

traefik vs pingap

traefik has 65,147 GitHub stars, 6,233 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. pingap has 1,390 stars, 104 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped today. traefik leads on adoption by 4,587% (65,147 vs 1,390 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; pingap is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pingap 7%. pingap was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K pingap ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik pingap
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 1.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-11
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 104
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick pingap if

  • You want the pingap feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pingap fits your workflow better

full pingap profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About pingap

Pingap is a high performance, open source reverse proxy written in Rust for operators who want nginx like routing with plugin based gateway features, hot reloaded TOML configuration, and a built in web admin UI.

read the full pingap overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or pingap more popular?

traefik has 65,147 GitHub stars and pingap has 1,390. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and pingap free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and pingap under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and pingap?

traefik is written in Go and pingap in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or pingap?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,147 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pingap if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.