head to head · open source

traefik vs piko

traefik has 65,052 GitHub stars, 6,221 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. piko has 2,194 stars, 89 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. traefik leads on adoption by 2,865% (65,052 vs 2,194 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; piko is written in Go under MIT. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, piko 4%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K piko ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik piko
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 2.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 89
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick piko if

  • You want the piko feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and piko fits your workflow better

full piko profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About piko

Piko is an open source reverse proxy and tunneling server in Go that lets you reach services with no public route by having them open outbound connections, and it is aimed at teams that need to serve production traffic or expose internal services from Kubernetes.

read the full piko overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or piko more popular?

traefik has 65,052 GitHub stars and piko has 2,194. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and piko free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and piko under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and piko?

traefik is written in Go and piko in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or piko?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,052 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose piko if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.