head to head · open source

traefik vs numa

traefik has 65,539 GitHub stars, 6,316 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. numa has 1,980 stars, 141 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. traefik leads on adoption by 3,210% (65,539 vs 1,980 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; numa is written in Rust under MIT. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, numa 7%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 66K numa ★ 2.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik numa
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 2.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-11-13 2026-11-10
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick numa if

  • You want the numa feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and numa fits your workflow better

full numa profile →

About traefik

Traefik (pronounced traffic ) is a modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components (Docker, Swarm mode, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, Amazon ECS, ...) and configures itself automatically and dynamically. Pointing Traefik at your orchestrator should be the only configuration step you need. . Overview . Features . Supported backends . Quickstart . Web UI . Documentation . . Support . Release cycle . Contributing . Maintainers . Credits . :warning: When migrating to a new major version of Traefik, please…

read the full traefik overview →

About numa

Numa DNS you own. Everywhere you go. — numa.rs A portable DNS resolver in a single binary. Block ads on any network, name your local services ( frontend.numa ), override any hostname with auto revert, and seal every outbound query with ODoH (RFC 9230) so no single party sees both who you are and what you asked — all from your laptop, no cloud account or Raspberry Pi required. Built from scratch in Rust. Zero DNS libraries. Caching, ad blocking, and local service domains out of the box. Optional recursive resolution from root nameservers with full DNSSEC chain of trust validation, plus a DNS over TLS listener for…

read the full numa overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or numa more popular?

traefik has 65,539 GitHub stars and numa has 1,980. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and numa free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and numa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and numa?

traefik is written in Go and numa in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or numa?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,539 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose numa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.