head to head · open source

traefik vs gdnsd

traefik has 65,147 GitHub stars, 6,233 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. gdnsd has 560 stars, 70 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. traefik leads on adoption by 11,533% (65,147 vs 560 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; gdnsd is written in C under GPL-3.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, gdnsd 13%. traefik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K gdnsd ★ 560 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik gdnsd
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 560
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-05-26
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick gdnsd if

  • You want the gdnsd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and gdnsd fits your workflow better

full gdnsd profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About gdnsd

gdnsd is an authoritative only DNS server written in C, intended for operators who need high performance name service with geographic balancing and failover rather than caching or recursion.

read the full gdnsd overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or gdnsd more popular?

traefik has 65,147 GitHub stars and gdnsd has 560. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and gdnsd free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and gdnsd under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and gdnsd?

traefik is written in Go and gdnsd in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or gdnsd?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,147 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gdnsd if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.