head to head · open source

traefik vs bind9

traefik has 65,066 GitHub stars, 6,224 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. bind9 has 779 stars, 186 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. traefik leads on adoption by 8,253% (65,066 vs 779 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; bind9 is written in C under MPL-2.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, bind9 24%. bind9 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K bind9 ★ 779 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik bind9
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 779
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 186
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick bind9 if

  • You want the bind9 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and bind9 fits your workflow better

full bind9 profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About bind9

BIND 9 is a complete, highly portable open source implementation of the Domain Name System protocol, written in C, for operators and organisations that need to run authoritative, recursive, or forwarding DNS infrastructure themselves.

read the full bind9 overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or bind9 more popular?

traefik has 65,066 GitHub stars and bind9 has 779. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and bind9 free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and bind9 under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and bind9?

traefik is written in Go and bind9 in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or bind9?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,066 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bind9 if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.