head to head · open source

traefik vs bfe

traefik has 64,942 GitHub stars, 6,201 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. bfe has 6,264 stars, 950 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 937% (64,942 vs 6,264 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; bfe is written in Go under Apache-2.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, bfe 15%. bfe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (golang, load-balancer, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

traefik ★ 65K bfe ★ 6.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

traefik bfe
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 6.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 950
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick traefik if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full traefik profile →

pick bfe if

  • You want the bfe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and bfe fits your workflow better

full bfe profile →

About traefik

Traefik — pronounced traffic — is "The Cloud Native Application Proxy": an MIT licensed, Go based HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that watches your orchestrator or service registry and generates its own routes, aimed at teams running microservices on Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, or Amazon ECS.

read the full traefik overview →

About bfe

BFE (Beyond Front End) is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed layer 7 load balancer written in Go, originally built at Baidu and now a Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) sandbox project, intended for platform, infrastructure, and networking engineers who need content based routing and centralized traffic management in front of backend services.

read the full bfe overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs traefik caddy vs traefik frp vs caddy frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

traefik vs frp traefik vs caddy traefik vs AdGuardHome traefik vs nginx traefik vs algo traefik vs nginx-proxy traefik vs goproxy traefik vs openvpn-install traefik vs cloudflared traefik vs amnezia-client traefik vs OpenVPN traefik vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is traefik or bfe more popular?

traefik has 64,942 GitHub stars and bfe has 6,264. traefik has the larger community by that measure.

Are traefik and bfe free?

Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and bfe under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between traefik and bfe?

traefik is written in Go and bfe in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, traefik or bfe?

Choose traefik if you want the larger community (64,942 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bfe if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.