head to head · open source

superfile vs PasswordPusher

superfile has 23,383 GitHub stars, 866 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. superfile leads on adoption by 630% (23,383 vs 3,202 stars). superfile is written in Go under MIT; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. superfile has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. PasswordPusher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

superfile ★ 23K PasswordPusher ★ 3.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

superfile PasswordPusher
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 3.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 866 ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick superfile if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full superfile profile →

pick PasswordPusher if

  • You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better

full PasswordPusher profile →

About superfile

superfile is a modern terminal file manager, written in Go, that gives Linux, macOS and Windows users a full screen text user interface for browsing and managing files, aimed at developers and command line users who want more than typed shell commands.

read the full superfile overview →

About PasswordPusher

PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.

read the full PasswordPusher overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

superfile vs LocalSend superfile vs rclone superfile vs copyparty superfile vs Files superfile vs yazi superfile vs Spacedrive superfile vs Nextcloud superfile vs uppy superfile vs cloudreve superfile vs ranger superfile vs Seafile superfile vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is superfile or PasswordPusher more popular?

superfile has 23,383 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. superfile has the larger community by that measure.

Are superfile and PasswordPusher free?

Both are open source. superfile is licensed under MIT and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between superfile and PasswordPusher?

superfile is written in Go and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, superfile or PasswordPusher?

Choose superfile if you want the larger community (23,383 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.