head to head · open source

cloudreve vs superfile

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars, 3,896 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. superfile has 23,303 stars, 856 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 23% (28,737 vs 23,303 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; superfile is written in Go under MIT. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, superfile 4%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (file-manager, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K superfile ★ 23K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve superfile
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 23K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 856
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick superfile if

  • You want the superfile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and superfile fits your workflow better

full superfile profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About superfile

superfile is a modern terminal file manager, written in Go, that gives Linux, macOS and Windows users a full screen text user interface for browsing and managing files, aimed at developers and command line users who want more than typed shell commands.

read the full superfile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop cloudreve vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or superfile more popular?

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars and superfile has 23,303. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and superfile free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and superfile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and superfile?

cloudreve is written in Go and superfile in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or superfile?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,737 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose superfile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.