head to head · open source

rclone vs superfile

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. superfile has 23,303 stars, 856 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 157% (59,844 vs 23,303 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; superfile is written in Go under MIT. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, superfile 4%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K superfile ★ 23K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone superfile
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 856
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick superfile if

  • You want the superfile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and superfile fits your workflow better

full superfile profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About superfile

superfile is a modern terminal file manager, written in Go, that gives Linux, macOS and Windows users a full screen text user interface for browsing and managing files, aimed at developers and command line users who want more than typed shell commands.

read the full superfile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop rclone vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or superfile more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and superfile has 23,303. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and superfile free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and superfile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and superfile?

rclone is written in Go and superfile in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or superfile?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose superfile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.