head to head · open source

superfile vs cyberduck

superfile has 23,303 GitHub stars, 856 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cyberduck has 4,788 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. superfile leads on adoption by 387% (23,303 vs 4,788 stars). superfile is written in Go under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. superfile has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

superfile ★ 23K cyberduck ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

superfile cyberduck
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 4.8K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 856 ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick superfile if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full superfile profile →

pick cyberduck if

  • You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better

full cyberduck profile →

About superfile

superfile is a modern terminal file manager, written in Go, that gives Linux, macOS and Windows users a full screen text user interface for browsing and managing files, aimed at developers and command line users who want more than typed shell commands.

read the full superfile overview →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

superfile vs LocalSend superfile vs rclone superfile vs copyparty superfile vs Files superfile vs yazi superfile vs Spacedrive superfile vs Nextcloud superfile vs uppy superfile vs cloudreve superfile vs ranger superfile vs Seafile superfile vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is superfile or cyberduck more popular?

superfile has 23,303 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,788. superfile has the larger community by that measure.

Are superfile and cyberduck free?

Both are open source. superfile is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between superfile and cyberduck?

superfile is written in Go and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, superfile or cyberduck?

Choose superfile if you want the larger community (23,303 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.