head to head · open source

cloudreve vs Seafile

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars, 3,896 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Seafile has 15,257 stars, 1,677 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 88% (28,737 vs 15,257 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Seafile is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Seafile 11%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cloud-storage, file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K Seafile ★ 15K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve Seafile
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick Seafile if

  • You want the Seafile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Seafile fits your workflow better

full Seafile profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About Seafile

Seafile is an open source cloud storage system written in C and positioned as a self hosted alternative to Dropbox and Google Drive. It organizes files into libraries, each of which can be synced separately, encrypted with a user chosen password, and shared between users or groups. The project lives in the self hosted file sync and document management ecosystem, where it combines storage, collaboration, knowledge management, and metadata features.

read the full Seafile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs PairDrop cloudreve vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or Seafile more popular?

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars and Seafile has 15,257. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and Seafile free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Seafile has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between cloudreve and Seafile?

cloudreve is written in Go and Seafile in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or Seafile?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,737 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Seafile if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.