head to head · open source

streama vs oryx

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars, 978 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. oryx has 881 stars, 158 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. streama leads on adoption by 1,015% (9,820 vs 881 stars). streama is written in JavaScript under MIT; oryx is written in Go under MIT. streama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, oryx 18%. oryx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

streama ★ 9.8K oryx ★ 881 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

streama oryx
GitHub stars ★ 9.8K ★ 881
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 978 ⑂ 158
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick streama if

  • You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full streama profile →

pick oryx if

  • You want the oryx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and oryx fits your workflow better

full oryx profile →

About streama

Streama is a self hosted streaming media server, written in JavaScript and released under the MIT licence, that gives someone with a large personal collection of films and shows a private Netflix style library they run and control themselves.

read the full streama overview →

About oryx

Oryx (SRS Stack) is an AI driven, all in one, out of the box, open source video solution for creating online video services such as live streaming and WebRTC, in the cloud or through self hosting, aimed at developers and operators who need to run those services themselves.

read the full oryx overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs streama go2rtc vs streama mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

streama vs mediamtx streama vs go2rtc streama vs tubearchivist streama vs CloudFlare-ImgBed streama vs Node-Media-Server streama vs Lychee streama vs seanime streama vs Piwigo streama vs nginx-http-flv-module streama vs foss_photo_libraries streama vs tubesync streama vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is streama or oryx more popular?

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars and oryx has 881. streama has the larger community by that measure.

Are streama and oryx free?

Both are open source. streama is licensed under MIT and oryx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between streama and oryx?

streama is written in JavaScript and oryx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, streama or oryx?

Choose streama if you want the larger community (9,820 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oryx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.