head to head · open source
streama vs foss_photo_libraries
streama has 9,820 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. foss_photo_libraries has 2,818 stars, 73 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. streama leads on adoption by 248% (9,820 vs 2,818 stars). streama is written in JavaScript under MIT; foss_photo_libraries is written in Python under MIT. streama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, foss_photo_libraries 3%. streama was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| streama | foss_photo_libraries | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.8K | ★ 2.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-04-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 977 | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick streama if
- You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foss_photo_libraries if
- You want the foss_photo_libraries feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and foss_photo_libraries fits your workflow better
About streama
STREAMA Docs: Ever had a huge bookshelf full of shows and movies? Ever wanted to digitalize them, but didn't have a good way of organizing the files? Worry no more! Streama is your own personal Netflix for just such a purpose! Live Demo credentials: username: demoUser password: demoUser Feel free to play around there as much as you like (everything is reset at night) We will keep this demo updated with our newest releases as they come, so that you can check out new features there first before deciding to deploy them in your own environments. Donate If you want to donate to the developer via bitcoin use…
read the full streama overview →
About foss_photo_libraries
📸 Free and OpenSource Photo Libraries There are many great free and open source alternatives to closed source and/or paid photo libraries. This project aims to track and compare the feature set between the many different options with a focus on 'Gratis' (free as in free beer) open source photo libraries. 'Libre' (free as in free speech) projects are also welcome, but will likely need to be submitted via a pull request since the time in testing each different project is significant. ⚠️ Disclaimer: This repository displays both objective and subjective measures of feature quality. The owner of this repository…
read the full foss_photo_libraries overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is streama or foss_photo_libraries more popular?
streama has 9,820 GitHub stars and foss_photo_libraries has 2,818. streama has the larger community by that measure.
Are streama and foss_photo_libraries free?
Both are open source. streama is licensed under MIT and foss_photo_libraries under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between streama and foss_photo_libraries?
streama is written in JavaScript and foss_photo_libraries in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, streama or foss_photo_libraries?
Choose streama if you want the larger community (9,820 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foss_photo_libraries if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.