head to head · open source

Ceph vs Spinifex

Ceph has 17,050 GitHub stars, 6,504 forks, 1,353 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Spinifex has 179 stars, 10 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ceph leads on adoption by 9,425% (17,050 vs 179 stars). Ceph is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; Spinifex is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Ceph has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, Spinifex 6%. Ceph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ceph ★ 17K Spinifex ★ 179 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ceph Spinifex
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 179
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.5K ⑂ 10
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ceph if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ceph profile →

pick Spinifex if

  • You want the Spinifex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Spinifex fits your workflow better

full Spinifex profile →

About Ceph

Ceph is a scalable open source distributed storage system written in C++ and described as a platform for object, block, and file storage. It lives in infrastructure and operations storage solutions, where it provides a shared storage layer across distributed nodes rather than a single local disk.

read the full Ceph overview →

About Spinifex

Spinifex is an open source, AGPL 3.0 infrastructure platform built by Mulga that recreates the AWS service surface — EC2, EBS, S3, VPC, IAM, ALB/NLB, EKS, ECR, ECS, and RDS — on bare metal, on premises hardware, and edge sites, for teams that need AWS APIs and tooling but cannot or will not run in a hyperscaler cloud.

read the full Spinifex overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs ceph immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Ceph vs Immich Ceph vs Paperless-ngx Ceph vs Filestash Ceph vs Garage Ceph vs Storj Ceph vs Alarik

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or Spinifex more popular?

Ceph has 17,050 GitHub stars and Spinifex has 179. Ceph has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ceph and Spinifex free?

Both are open source. Ceph has no licence declared in this registry, and Spinifex is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Ceph and Spinifex?

Ceph is written in C++ and Spinifex in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ceph or Spinifex?

Choose Ceph if you want the larger community (17,050 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Spinifex if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.