head to head · open source

Sentry vs CocoaLumberjack

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars, 4,857 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped today. CocoaLumberjack has 13,320 stars, 2,274 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 236% (44,806 vs 13,320 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; CocoaLumberjack is written in Objective-C under BSD-3-Clause. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, CocoaLumberjack 17%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sentry ★ 45K CocoaLumberjack ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sentry CocoaLumberjack
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 13K
License Custom / other BSD-3-Clause
Written in Python Objective-C
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sentry if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sentry profile →

pick CocoaLumberjack if

  • You want the CocoaLumberjack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Objective-C
  • You evaluated both and CocoaLumberjack fits your workflow better

full CocoaLumberjack profile →

About Sentry

Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.

read the full Sentry overview →

About CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast and flexible logging framework, written primarily in Objective C with first class Swift support, for applications targeting macOS, iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS.

read the full CocoaLumberjack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Sentry vs Uptime Kuma Sentry vs worldmonitor Sentry vs NetData Sentry vs Grafana Sentry vs huginn Sentry vs SigNoz Sentry vs Grafana Loki Sentry vs beszel Sentry vs cilium Sentry vs Apache SkyWalking Sentry vs jaeger Sentry vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Sentry or CocoaLumberjack more popular?

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars and CocoaLumberjack has 13,320. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sentry and CocoaLumberjack free?

Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and CocoaLumberjack is licensed under BSD-3-Clause. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Sentry and CocoaLumberjack?

Sentry is written in Python and CocoaLumberjack in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sentry or CocoaLumberjack?

Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,806 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose CocoaLumberjack if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.