head to head · open source

NocoDB vs rxdb

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars, 5,058 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped today. rxdb has 23,386 stars, 1,175 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 178% (65,016 vs 23,386 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; rxdb is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rxdb 5%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K rxdb ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB rxdb
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 23K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick rxdb if

  • You want the rxdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rxdb fits your workflow better

full rxdb profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About rxdb

RxDB is a local first, reactive NoSQL database for JavaScript applications, aimed at developers building offline capable or realtime user interfaces who want client side data storage and sync through their own backend rather than a hosted vendor.

read the full rxdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or rxdb more popular?

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars and rxdb has 23,386. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and rxdb free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and rxdb is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and rxdb?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and rxdb in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or rxdb?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,016 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose rxdb if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.