head to head · open source

rustfs vs nitrite-java

rustfs has 33,997 GitHub stars, 1,529 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. nitrite-java has 916 stars, 95 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 3,611% (33,997 vs 916 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; nitrite-java is written in Java under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, nitrite-java 10%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 34K nitrite-java ★ 916 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs nitrite-java
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 916
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Java
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 95
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick nitrite-java if

  • You want the nitrite-java feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and nitrite-java fits your workflow better

full nitrite-java profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About nitrite-java

Nitrite (NOsql Object, or NO2) is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed NoSQL embedded document store for Java that runs inside the application process and is aimed at developers building desktop, mobile, and small web applications.

read the full nitrite-java overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs cubefs rustfs vs lakeFS rustfs vs ZeroFS rustfs vs versitygw rustfs vs cloudserver rustfs vs aistore

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or nitrite-java more popular?

rustfs has 33,997 GitHub stars and nitrite-java has 916. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and nitrite-java free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nitrite-java under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and nitrite-java?

rustfs is written in Rust and nitrite-java in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or nitrite-java?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,997 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nitrite-java if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.