head to head · open source

rustfs vs bigfunctions

rustfs has 33,216 GitHub stars, 1,486 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. bigfunctions has 759 stars, 70 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 4,276% (33,216 vs 759 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; bigfunctions is written in Python under MIT. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, bigfunctions 9%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 33K bigfunctions ★ 759 category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs bigfunctions
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 759
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-23
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick bigfunctions if

  • You want the bigfunctions feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and bigfunctions fits your workflow better

full bigfunctions profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About bigfunctions

BigFunctions is an open source Python framework, released under the MIT licence, for building a governed catalog of BigQuery functions — packaged with a community library of more than 150 functions that can be called directly or redeployed — and it is aimed at data engineers, analysts, and teams working inside Google BigQuery.

read the full bigfunctions overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils rustfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or bigfunctions more popular?

rustfs has 33,216 GitHub stars and bigfunctions has 759. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and bigfunctions free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bigfunctions under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and bigfunctions?

rustfs is written in Rust and bigfunctions in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or bigfunctions?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,216 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bigfunctions if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.