head to head · open source

rustfs vs arc

rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars, 1,482 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. arc has 676 stars, 52 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 4,798% (33,108 vs 676 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; arc is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, arc 8%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 33K arc ★ 676 category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs arc
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 676
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 52
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick arc if

  • You want the arc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and arc fits your workflow better

full arc profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About arc

Arc is an open, SQL native time series database, released under AGPL 3.0, for engineers and platform teams who need to keep full resolution telemetry from machines, services, vehicles, and devices and still query recent and historical data together in one system.

read the full arc overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or arc more popular?

rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars and arc has 676. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and arc free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and arc under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and arc?

rustfs is written in Rust and arc in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or arc?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,108 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose arc if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.