head to head · open source

NocoDB vs rocksdb

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rocksdb has 32,108 stars, 6,931 forks, 1,645 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 102% (65,002 vs 32,108 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; rocksdb is written in C++ under GPL-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rocksdb 22%. rocksdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K rocksdb ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB rocksdb
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 32K
License Custom / other GPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 6.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick rocksdb if

  • You want the rocksdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and rocksdb fits your workflow better

full rocksdb profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About rocksdb

RocksDB is an embeddable, persistent key value store written in C++ and developed by the Facebook Database Engineering Team. It is a library rather than a standalone server, and it forms the core building block for a fast key value server. The project builds on earlier work on LevelDB by Sanjay Ghemawat and Jeff Dean, and it lives in the systems infrastructure and database ecosystem, carrying the topics database and storage engine. It has been public for roughly fourteen years and is dual licensed under GPLv2 and Apache 2.0, so a user may select either license at their option.

read the full rocksdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs InfluxDB

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or rocksdb more popular?

NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and rocksdb has 32,108. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and rocksdb free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and rocksdb is licensed under GPL-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and rocksdb?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and rocksdb in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or rocksdb?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose rocksdb if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.