head to head · open source

NocoDB vs Dragonfly

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dragonfly has 31,573 stars, 1,263 forks, 308 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 106% (64,998 vs 31,573 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Dragonfly is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Dragonfly 4%. Dragonfly was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K Dragonfly ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB Dragonfly
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 32K
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick Dragonfly if

  • You want the Dragonfly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Dragonfly fits your workflow better

full Dragonfly profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About Dragonfly

Dragonfly is a C++ in memory data store that speaks the Redis and Memcached APIs, built for teams that want more throughput and lower resource use from an existing cache or key value workload without changing application code.

read the full Dragonfly overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or Dragonfly more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and Dragonfly has 31,573. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and Dragonfly free?

Neither NocoDB nor Dragonfly declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and Dragonfly?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and Dragonfly in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or Dragonfly?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Dragonfly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.