head to head · open source

kong vs robusta

kong has 44,158 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. robusta has 3,099 stars, 325 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 1,325% (44,158 vs 3,099 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; robusta is written in Python under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, robusta 10%. robusta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (devops, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K robusta ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong robusta
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 325
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick robusta if

  • You want the robusta feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and robusta fits your workflow better

full robusta profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About robusta

Robusta is an open source alerting and monitoring project for Kubernetes, written in Python and released under the MIT license. The repository contains Robusta Classic, a rule based alert enrichment engine that connects to Prometheus through a webhook and adds operational context to alerts. It lives in the Kubernetes monitoring ecosystem and is compatible with kube prometheus stack, Prometheus Operator, and other Prometheus based setups.

read the full robusta overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs kubernetes kong vs Docker kong vs portainer kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or robusta more popular?

kong has 44,158 GitHub stars and robusta has 3,099. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and robusta free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and robusta under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and robusta?

kong is written in Lua and robusta in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or robusta?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,158 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose robusta if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.