head to head · open source

QuestDB vs Bytebase

QuestDB has 17,326 GitHub stars, 1,647 forks, 952 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bytebase has 14,491 stars, 983 forks, 167 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QuestDB leads on adoption by 20% (17,326 vs 14,491 stars). QuestDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Bytebase is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. QuestDB has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Bytebase 7%. Bytebase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

QuestDB ★ 17K Bytebase ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

QuestDB Bytebase
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 983
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick QuestDB if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full QuestDB profile →

pick Bytebase if

  • You want the Bytebase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Bytebase fits your workflow better

full Bytebase profile →

About QuestDB

QuestDB open source time series database. Java, Apache 2.0, category Infrastructure & Operations / Databases. Lives in open source database ecosystem for massive data scale, low latency, real time analytics.

read the full QuestDB overview →

About Bytebase

Bytebase is an open source database governance platform that acts as a single control plane between human users, AI agents, and databases. It governs change management, access control, and compliance so that every database change and query can be reviewed, controlled, and recorded. The project sits in the Infrastructure and Operations database ecosystem, with topics that include CI/CD, DevOps, DevSecOps, GitOps, data governance, data masking, data security, database access, Flyway, Liquibase, and MongoDB.

read the full Bytebase overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

QuestDB vs mall QuestDB vs Prometheus QuestDB vs NocoDB QuestDB vs etcd QuestDB vs DBeaver QuestDB vs orm QuestDB vs Milvus QuestDB vs TiDB QuestDB vs drawDB QuestDB vs typeorm QuestDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager QuestDB vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is QuestDB or Bytebase more popular?

QuestDB has 17,326 GitHub stars and Bytebase has 14,491. QuestDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are QuestDB and Bytebase free?

Both are open source. QuestDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Bytebase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between QuestDB and Bytebase?

QuestDB is written in Java and Bytebase in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, QuestDB or Bytebase?

Choose QuestDB if you want the larger community (17,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Bytebase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.