head to head · open source
quasar vs pasteguard
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,667 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. pasteguard has 807 stars, 44 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,271% (27,207 vs 807 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; pasteguard is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, pasteguard 5%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | pasteguard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 807 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pasteguard if
- You want the pasteguard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and pasteguard fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About pasteguard
AI gets the context. Not your private data. PasteGuard masks PII and secrets before they reach ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, your API provider, Codex, or Claude Code. Browser Chat · Apps & APIs · Coding Agents · Documentation You keep the originals. Providers see placeholders. Run it locally or self host it in your own infrastructure. What PasteGuard Protects PasteGuard is a local first privacy layer for teams that cannot send raw client data, customer records, logs, credentials, or production details directly to model providers. It works in three places: Browser Chat ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Paste customer…
read the full pasteguard overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or pasteguard more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and pasteguard has 807. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and pasteguard free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and pasteguard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and pasteguard?
quasar is written in JavaScript and pasteguard in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or pasteguard?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pasteguard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.