head to head · open source

Avalonia vs quasar

Avalonia has 31,518 GitHub stars, 2,826 forks, 1,875 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,674 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Avalonia leads on adoption by 16% (31,518 vs 27,210 stars). Avalonia is written in C# under MIT; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. Avalonia has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, quasar 14%. Avalonia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (android, ios), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Avalonia ★ 32K quasar ★ 27K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Avalonia quasar
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 27K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Avalonia if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Avalonia profile →

pick quasar if

  • You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better

full quasar profile →

About Avalonia

Avalonia is a cross platform UI framework for .NET, written in C and driven by XAML. It provides a flexible styling system and targets a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android and WebAssembly. The project is mature and production ready, and it is used by companies such as Schneider Electric, Unity, JetBrains and GitHub. It lives in the .NET ecosystem and is distributed through the NuGet package manager.

read the full Avalonia overview →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Avalonia vs uBlock Avalonia vs Ladybird Avalonia vs chrome-devtools-mcp Avalonia vs monaco-editor Avalonia vs Zen Browser Avalonia vs servo Avalonia vs serenity Avalonia vs refined-github Avalonia vs slate Avalonia vs webtorrent Avalonia vs fingerprintjs Avalonia vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Avalonia or quasar more popular?

Avalonia has 31,518 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. Avalonia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Avalonia and quasar free?

Both are open source. Avalonia is licensed under MIT and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Avalonia and quasar?

Avalonia is written in C# and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Avalonia or quasar?

Choose Avalonia if you want the larger community (31,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.