head to head · open source
webtorrent vs quasar
webtorrent has 31,465 GitHub stars, 2,852 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. webtorrent leads on adoption by 16% (31,465 vs 27,210 stars). webtorrent is written in JavaScript under MIT; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. webtorrent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, quasar 13%. webtorrent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webtorrent | quasar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 27K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 3.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webtorrent if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick quasar if
- You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better
About webtorrent
WebTorrent The streaming torrent client. For node.js and the web. Sponsored by WebTorrent is a streaming torrent client for node.js and the browser . YEP, THAT'S RIGHT. THE BROWSER. It's written completely in JavaScript – the language of the web – so the same code works in both runtimes. In node.js, this module is a simple torrent client, using TCP and UDP to talk to other torrent clients. In the browser, WebTorrent uses WebRTC (data channels) for peer to peer transport. It can be used without browser plugins, extensions, or installations. It's Just JavaScript™. Note: WebTorrent does not support UDP/TCP peers in…
read the full webtorrent overview →
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webtorrent or quasar more popular?
webtorrent has 31,465 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. webtorrent has the larger community by that measure.
Are webtorrent and quasar free?
Both are open source. webtorrent is licensed under MIT and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webtorrent and quasar?
webtorrent is written in JavaScript and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webtorrent or quasar?
Choose webtorrent if you want the larger community (31,465 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.